Four programs from Tyshkovskiy et al., Cell 2023, tagged by whether they move
with, against, or
apart from aging. Genes come from the page catalog.
Same genes as a scatter: Relationship.
SP121 · RELATED HALLMARK CONTEXT
SP121 hallmark context
Published hallmark aggregates shown next to the four literature programs.
Related context only — not a mechanism score.
Interpretation boundary.
Rankings reuse mean values from the published hallmark signature set.
Scores from different hallmark signatures are not directly comparable. Cell-type rankings
require at least 100 cells; links appear only when atlas routing metadata matches both the exact label and cell count.
01
IGF1 / Insulin Signaling Downregulation
Nutrient-sensing hallmark context, not an IGF-inhibition assay.
Reinforcinglongevity ↓ · aging ↓— longevity & aging move the same way (shared downregulation)
Downregulation of Igf1 and the insulin/IGF-1 axis is the single most universal longevity signature, seen across tissues and species. Strikingly, it also declines with age — the paper's clearest example that not every age-related change is detrimental: long-lived species and aged organisms shift the same way.
Upregulated mitochondrial translation is a shared, universal longevity mechanism. Mitochondrial mass and biogenesis (PGC-1α, mitochondrial sirtuins) tend to decline with age — so longevity programs are enriched precisely for functions that aging runs down, i.e. they counteract the aging trajectory.
Long-lived species are enriched for evolutionarily ancient essential genes involved in proteolysis, DNA repair and PI3K-Akt signaling. Chaperones, the proteasome, telomere maintenance and NAD+/sirtuin systems all rise in longevity programs but decline with age — longevity restores the very machinery aging erodes.
Divergentlongevity ↑ · aging ↑ (adaptive vs inflammaging)— species longevity diverges from intervention logic
The most species-distinct mechanism: innate immune / complement genes are UP in some long-lived species (whales, naked mole-rat) — proposed as adaptive clearance of damaged or precancerous cells. Yet these same genes rise with age as chronic "inflammaging", and lifespan-extending interventions DOWN-regulate them. Longevity and aging overlap in direction but diverge in meaning — and differ from intervention logic.
▸ Counteracting-suppression markers (longevity opposes an age-driven rise)
mTOR↓/↑MTOR / nutrient sensing
Rapamycin target; activity low for longevity but rises with age. PMID ↗
GDF15↓/↑Inflammation / stress (hormokine)
Rises with age/stress; longevity keeps it low. PMID ↗
CRP↓/↑Inflammation (clinical)
Long-lived populations show low CRP; CRP rises with age. PMID ↗
CD28↑/↓Immunosenescence
CD28+ T cells retained in long-lived; loss marks senescent T cells. PMID ↗
SASP↓/↑Cellular senescence
Senescent secretome reduced by longevity programs, accumulates with age. PMID ↗
Sources & method.
Mechanisms and directions curated from Tyshkovskiy et al., Cell 2023, Distinct longevity mechanisms across and within species and their association with aging
(PMID 37269831, 41-species multi-tissue RNA-seq + 92 aging-dataset meta-analysis) and Gladyshev-lab longevity signatures.
Per-gene directions (change in long-lived species versus change with age) come from the pinned gene catalog for this module; representative PubMed links are class-level reviews unless otherwise noted.
Class tags derive from the sign of the two directions (reinforcing/counteracting) plus mechanism semantics (divergent for innate immunity).